NDIS Practice Standards
Module 1: High intensity daily personal activities
m1-4.1 Enteral feeding: participant-involved plan, practitioner review, escalation
Clause and reference m1-4.1, our reference for this requirement in the NDIS Practice Standards and Quality Indicators
The requirement
Each participant is involved in assessing and developing their enteral feeding and management plan; with consent, an appropriately qualified health practitioner reviews their health status regularly and in good time; and the plan sets out how risks, incidents and emergencies are managed, including required actions and escalation.
Our wording of the requirement: our statement of what the clause asks, not the instrument verbatim. Source: NDIS Practice Standards on the compliance desk.
The evidence to bring
- Enteral feeding plan from the dietitian or treating team, covering regime, flushing and medication via tube
- Feeding and fluid balance charts
- Practitioner review records
- Escalation steps for tube displacement, aspiration or blockage
What assessors commonly find
- Regime changed by the hospital but plan not updated
- No steps for a dislodged tube
What evidence do I need?
For m1-4.1 Enteral feeding: participant-involved plan, practitioner review, escalation, the evidence to bring is: Enteral feeding plan from the dietitian or treating team, covering regime, flushing and medication via tube; Feeding and fluid balance charts. Keep every record dated, signed and current, and name who owns it.
Answer the reviewer first
Show me enteral feeding plan from the dietitian or treating team, covering regime, flushing and medication via tube, and tell me who owns it and when it was last reviewed.
That is the question a quality assessor opens with for this requirement. Have the record on the desk and the date it was last reviewed to hand.
Read your own evidence against this clause
Paste your policy or evidence pack and the reading marks, line by line, whether a phrase from this requirement appears and quotes your own words when it does. It is a reading of your text, not a compliance result; a quality assessor decides whether a requirement is met. Read your pack, free See the paid reading